Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. confirms its independence as a community-led campaign

August 22, 2026
Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. confirms that it is a community-led, volunteer-run and politically independent campaign, welcoming support from across the political spectrum while remaining focused solely on MOD Bicester Site A.

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. is aware of continuing suggestions that the campaign is affiliated with the Liberal Democrats.

It is not.

In the urgency of the initial response to the Government’s proposal for MOD Bicester Site A, practical support was provided by people with experience, networks and resources within the local Liberal Democrats. We have never sought to hide that support, and we remain grateful to everyone who helped the community organise quickly.

But the campaign has developed significantly since those first days.

Today, Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. is a community-led, volunteer-run and politically independent campaign, operating through Bicester Countryside and Communities C.I.C.

People from across the political spectrum

Our Leadership Team includes people who have previously supported or voted for Reform, Labour, Conservative, Greens, Independents, and Liberal Democrat candidates, alongside people with no political affiliation at all.

Within Wrong Plan. Wrong Site., none of them represents a political party.

Our shared purpose is not party politics.

It is MOD Bicester Site A and the interests of the communities affected by the proposal.

Different groups have different roles

We also recognise the work being done by protest groups and other local organisations. They are helping to keep community concern visible, build awareness and ensure local voices are heard.

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. has a different, but complementary, role.

Our focus is on building the legal, planning, evidence, community and financial capability required for the longer-term challenge ahead.

That includes gathering and testing evidence, seeking specialist planning and legal advice, engaging with residents and businesses, supporting work towards any appropriate formal legal challenge, and working collaboratively with parish councils, Bicester Town Council, Cherwell District Council, Piddington and other community organisations.

We are also building relationships with communities elsewhere in the UK affected by similar proposals, so that experience, evidence and lessons can be shared.

Working with elected representatives does not make us party political

Our Member of Parliament is an important stakeholder in the campaign.

Whatever anyone’s personal politics, the constituency MP is the democratically elected representative for the area and has access to Parliament, ministers and Government departments that can help ensure local concerns are heard.

Engaging with an MP, councillor or political representative does not make Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. Conservative, Labour, Liberal Democrat or Reform.

It means the campaign is using the appropriate democratic channels available to it.

We will engage constructively with any elected representative or organisation that can help advance the interests of the communities affected by Site A.

Independent, but willing to work together

We believe there is both room and a need for different groups to play different roles.

No single organisation needs to be everything to everyone.

Where objectives align, groups can work together, share information and support one another while retaining their own independence, structures and areas of expertise.

What matters is keeping the interests of local communities at the centre of that work.

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. welcomes support from people across the political spectrum – and from those with no political affiliation whatsoever.

Different groups. Different strengths. One community.

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site.

More news

Greg Smith MP Challenges Government Over MOD Bicester Site A Costs

Greg Smith MP Challenges Government Over MOD Bicester Site A Costs

Greg Smith MP has challenged the Government over new cost modelling suggesting MOD Bicester Site A could cost more than two-and-a-half times as much as equivalent asylum hotels per person per night.
Bicester MP’s Bid for Greater Transparency Over Asylum Accommodation Costs and Site Suitability Rejected

Bicester MP’s Bid for Greater Transparency Over Asylum Accommodation Costs and Site Suitability Rejected

Bicester MP Calum Miller's proposals to require greater transparency over the costs and suitability of large asylum accommodation sites have been rejected. We examine what this means for MOD Bicester Site A and the concerns raised by ...
Up to 50,000 People Could Pass Through MOD Bicester Over Ten Years

Up to 50,000 People Could Pass Through MOD Bicester Over Ten Years

Approximately 50,000 people could pass through MOD Bicester Site A over ten years, based on the proposed capacity and 90-day stays. Wrong Plan Wrong Site is challenging the Government’s decision that a full Environmental Impact ...
No results found.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.