Wrong Plan. Wrong Site.

The Home Office has proposed placing an asylum accommodation centre for 1,250 single male residents at MOD Bicester Site A. We are a non-political community campaign group challenging this proposal because it’s the wrong plan for the wrong site.

Oppose the proposed asylum accommodation centre at MOD Bicester Site A

The Government is proposing to use MOD Bicester Site A to accommodate approximately 1,250 single adult male asylum seekers.

We are a community-led, non-political campaign bringing together residents from Bicester and the surrounding villages. We believe a proposal of this scale must be supported by clear evidence, proper planning and meaningful consultation with the communities it will affect.

Our campaign is about the proposal, the process and the suitability of the site – not the individuals who may be accommodated there.

The proposal at a glance

The Home Office is seeking to establish a large-scale asylum accommodation centre at the former MOD storage and logistics site south-west of Bicester.

Key Facts

Approximately 1,250 residents

A rural and relatively isolated former military site

Limited pedestrian access and public transport

Proposed use lasting at least ten years

Important technical assessments have not yet been published

The proposal is being progressed through an Urgent Crown Development process and is expected to accommodate approximately 1,250 people. The Government has indicated that the site could remain in use for at least ten years.

Why we oppose the plan

Our concerns are practical, evidence-led and community-focused

We believe the Government has not yet demonstrated that this is the right location for a development of this scale.

The campaign is seeking clear answers about:

Roads and transport

The site is surrounded by rural roads, with limited footways, lighting and public transport. Historical planning evidence also raised serious concerns about pedestrian safety and the isolated nature of the location.

Infrastructure and public services

The Government must demonstrate that water, wastewater, electricity, healthcare, emergency services and other local infrastructure can safely support the proposal without harming existing communities.

Health and safeguarding

The Government must demonstrate how safeguarding will work both for people accommodated at Site A and for surrounding communities, including women, children and vulnerable people.

Transparency and consultation

Decisions affecting communities should be made with them, not imposed upon them. The Government should publish the evidence behind the proposal and provide residents with a genuine opportunity to be heard.

Accountability

A development involving multiple agencies needs clear lines of responsibility. The Government should explain who owns each risk, who monitors mitigation and who is accountable if measures fail.

A community-led campaign

Our community deserves a voice

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. is a non-political campaign led by the communities affected by the proposal.

We welcome support from people of all political views. Our shared concern is that decisions of this importance should be lawful, transparent, evidence-based and made with proper regard for local communities.

We are committed to challenging the proposal firmly, responsibly and respectfully.

Take action

The campaign is already making solid progress. Our community volunteers are gathering evidence, scrutinising the Government’s proposals and challenging the process through the appropriate channels.

Right now, we are encouraging local people to contact the relevant decision-makers and make clear that the community expects transparency, proper planning and meaningful consultation.

We are also raising funds to help pay for specialist planning, legal and professional advice, evidence gathering and campaign activity.

At the very least, you can stay informed by signing up for campaign updates.

Write to decision-makers

Sign up for updates

Volunteer

Latest updates

Sewage, flooding and cost: new questions over infrastructure at MOD Bicester Site A

Sewage, flooding and cost: new questions over infrastructure at MOD Bicester Site A

Applicant documents reveal unresolved sewer capacity, potential sewage tankering, existing flooding and significant drainage infrastructure requirements at MOD Bicester Site A.
MOD’s own records show strategic importance of Bicester training estate

MOD’s own records show strategic importance of Bicester training estate

Official MOD records describe Bicester Site A, St George’s Barracks and Piddington as core strategic defence infrastructure, raising new questions over asylum accommodation plans.
Diesel crisis raises fresh questions over MOD Bicester power plans

Diesel crisis raises fresh questions over MOD Bicester power plans

Fresh concerns have been raised over the proposed reliance on diesel generators at MOD Bicester Site A, as UK diesel prices climb sharply and global supply risks increase.
No results found.

Stay informed

Join the campaign mailing list for important updates, public meeting details, planning developments and ways to take action.

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Decisions should be made with communities – not imposed upon them

Help us demand transparency, proper planning and meaningful consultation for Bicester MOD Site A.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.