Home Office presses ahead with Site A plans despite High Court challenge, awarding £1.2m design contract

November 9, 2026
The Home Office is pressing ahead with plans for MoD Bicester Site A despite an ongoing High Court challenge, awarding a £1.2 million design contract for the proposed asylum accommodation development.

The Home Office is pressing ahead with plans for a major asylum accommodation development at MoD Bicester Site A, awarding a £1.2 million design contract despite an ongoing High Court legal challenge brought by local campaigners.

New documents published on the government’s Contracts Finder website today (9th November) reveal that construction specialist Reds10 (UK) Limited was awarded the contract on 3 November 2026.

The contract covers detailed design work for the proposed development, which could accommodate up to 1,256 asylum seekers at the former military site near Bicester.

 

£1.2 million committed to detailed design

The contract is valued at £1,204,648.97, including VAT, and covers RIBA stages 3 and 4, which involve developing the detailed architectural and engineering designs for the proposed development.

Work began on the 3rd of November and is scheduled for completion on the 5th January 2027.

The award represents a significant step forward in the Home Office’s preparations for the site, with more than £1 million now committed to detailed design work while the proposed development remains subject to planning approval and legal scrutiny.

 

High Court challenge remains ongoing

The contract award comes less than two weeks after Wrong Plan Wrong Site (WPWS), through Bicester Countryside and Communities CIC, launched a High Court legal challenge against the government’s decision not to require a full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the development.

The challenge, announced on the 23rd of October, questions whether the government acted lawfully in reaching that decision, particularly while investigations relating to contamination, ecology and wastewater infrastructure remained outstanding.

Cherwell District Council has also been included as an interested party in the legal proceedings.

The award of the design contract does not resolve or determine the outcome of the legal challenge, which concerns the environmental assessment process.

 

Construction has not yet been approved

Importantly, the newly published contract relates to design work only rather than the construction of the proposed accommodation.

The Home Office has structured the project as a two-stage design and build arrangement, with a separate contract required for the actual building works.

The government notice explicitly states:

Under the awarded opportunity, the Authority has no commitment to enter into the Stage 2 building works contract.

The Home Office has also stated that awarding contracts for design and technical assessment does not represent a final decision to open or operate the site.

Nevertheless, the award confirms that substantial design work is now being commissioned, with completion scheduled for early January 2027.

 

What happens next?

The proposed development remains subject to the government’s Urgent Crown Development planning process, alongside the separate High Court challenge concerning the Environmental Impact Assessment screening decision.

The newly published documents do not confirm when construction might begin, whether a construction contract will ultimately be awarded, or the total anticipated cost of the development.

WPWS will continue to monitor the planning process, legal proceedings and further government spending associated with the proposals.

The full contract award notice, including the accompanying redacted contract documentation, can be viewed on the government’s Contracts Finder website.

More news

Could Site A’s Diesel Generators Affect Air Quality in Nearby Villages?

Could Site A’s Diesel Generators Affect Air Quality in Nearby Villages?

The proposed accommodation centre at MOD Bicester Site A would need a substantial and dependable electricity supply. The published application includes generator facilities, raising a question for people living in.
If Not Site A, Then Where? Why the Government Must Consider Better Alternatives

If Not Site A, Then Where? Why the Government Must Consider Better Alternatives

If MOD Bicester Site A is the wrong location, where should asylum seekers go? We examine the alternatives to former military bases, the financial questions surrounding Site A and why finding suitable accommodation is the Government's ...
Moving Asylum Seekers Out of Hotels Should Save Money. But Will MOD Bicester Site A?

Moving Asylum Seekers Out of Hotels Should Save Money. But Will MOD Bicester Site A?

The Home Office recorded a £22.9 million loss on unused hotel accommodation. Meanwhile, Wrong Plan Wrong Site estimates that MOD Bicester Site A could cost £338 per person, per night — more than twice the £144 hotel comparator ...
No results found.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.