Urgent Crown Development application confirmed for MOD Bicester

July 15, 2026
The Home Office has confirmed that it has submitted an Urgent Crown Development application, raising serious concerns about consultation, transparency and the justification for treating the proposal as urgent.

The Home Office has confirmed that the MOD Bicester proposal is being pursued through an Urgent Crown Development planning application.

The confirmation was provided in response to a Parliamentary Question submitted by Calum Miller MP. The Home Office said that an application had been submitted to obtain planning permission, while stressing that no final decision would be made until planning and other due-diligence work had been completed.

Urgent Crown Development procedures are intended for Crown proposals considered both nationally important and urgent. The use of this route has therefore prompted questions about the opportunities local residents, councils and statutory organisations will have to examine the evidence and respond.

Those concerns are heightened by the Government’s admission that the Home Office first informed the Ministry of Defence in November 2025 that it was considering the potential use of MOD Bicester. Feasibility work and initial surveys had already been progressing before the wider public announcement in June.

The campaign believes the Government must explain why a proposal under consideration since November now requires an urgent planning process.

Matthew Pennycook, the Minister for Housing and Planning, was asked why the urgent route had been selected. His Parliamentary response referred to a previous Written Ministerial Statement but did not provide a detailed, site-specific explanation of the urgency attached to MOD Bicester.

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. is calling for the Government to publish its formal statements of urgency and national importance, along with the evidence of need, alternatives considered and the arrangements for public consultation.

A major development expected to operate for at least ten years should be subject to transparent and meaningful scrutiny.

More news

Is the Government risking a wildlife crime at MOD Bicester?

Is the Government risking a wildlife crime at MOD Bicester?

Fresh evidence of bat activity at MOD Bicester Site A is raising serious questions about the Government’s ecological surveys and the use of powerful floodlights over the weekend.
Floodlights return for second night at MOD Bicester Site A

Floodlights return for second night at MOD Bicester Site A

Floodlights were reportedly switched on again at MOD Bicester Site A on Saturday night, prompting fresh concern over the potential impact on bats and other nocturnal wildlife.
Overnight floodlighting at MOD Bicester Site A raises fresh questions over impact on bats

Overnight floodlighting at MOD Bicester Site A raises fresh questions over impact on bats

Bright floodlights were seen illuminating MOD Bicester Site A for several hours overnight, raising fresh questions about their potential impact on bats while the adequacy of the site’s ecological assessment is already under legal challenge.
No results found.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.