Urgent Crown Development application confirmed for MOD Bicester

July 15, 2026
The Home Office has confirmed that it has submitted an Urgent Crown Development application, raising serious concerns about consultation, transparency and the justification for treating the proposal as urgent.

The Home Office has confirmed that the MOD Bicester proposal is being pursued through an Urgent Crown Development planning application.

The confirmation was provided in response to a Parliamentary Question submitted by Calum Miller MP. The Home Office said that an application had been submitted to obtain planning permission, while stressing that no final decision would be made until planning and other due-diligence work had been completed.

Urgent Crown Development procedures are intended for Crown proposals considered both nationally important and urgent. The use of this route has therefore prompted questions about the opportunities local residents, councils and statutory organisations will have to examine the evidence and respond.

Those concerns are heightened by the Government’s admission that the Home Office first informed the Ministry of Defence in November 2025 that it was considering the potential use of MOD Bicester. Feasibility work and initial surveys had already been progressing before the wider public announcement in June.

The campaign believes the Government must explain why a proposal under consideration since November now requires an urgent planning process.

Matthew Pennycook, the Minister for Housing and Planning, was asked why the urgent route had been selected. His Parliamentary response referred to a previous Written Ministerial Statement but did not provide a detailed, site-specific explanation of the urgency attached to MOD Bicester.

Wrong Plan. Wrong Site. is calling for the Government to publish its formal statements of urgency and national importance, along with the evidence of need, alternatives considered and the arrangements for public consultation.

A major development expected to operate for at least ten years should be subject to transparent and meaningful scrutiny.

More news

Greg Smith MP Challenges Government Over MOD Bicester Site A Costs

Greg Smith MP Challenges Government Over MOD Bicester Site A Costs

Greg Smith MP has challenged the Government over new cost modelling suggesting MOD Bicester Site A could cost more than two-and-a-half times as much as equivalent asylum hotels per person per night.
Bicester MP’s Bid for Greater Transparency Over Asylum Accommodation Costs and Site Suitability Rejected

Bicester MP’s Bid for Greater Transparency Over Asylum Accommodation Costs and Site Suitability Rejected

Bicester MP Calum Miller's proposals to require greater transparency over the costs and suitability of large asylum accommodation sites have been rejected. We examine what this means for MOD Bicester Site A and the concerns raised by ...
Up to 50,000 People Could Pass Through MOD Bicester Over Ten Years

Up to 50,000 People Could Pass Through MOD Bicester Over Ten Years

Approximately 50,000 people could pass through MOD Bicester Site A over ten years, based on the proposed capacity and 90-day stays. Wrong Plan Wrong Site is challenging the Government’s decision that a full Environmental Impact ...
No results found.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.